Il se passe des trucs en gériatrie et je ne peux pas tout suivre… Outre un prof de Tours, dont la communauté tolère 7 rétractations pour plagiat car ce n’est pas un problème (je suis émerveillé), il y a d’autres gériatres qui ont plagié.
Par exemple, le 3 décembre 2021, une rétractation a été faite par la revue Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. On pourrait se demander s’il y a beaucoup de rétractations en gériatrie et pourquoi ? La plupart des gériatres que je connais sont intègres. Il y a un village gaulois à Toulouse, mais qui n’atteint pas tous les membres de ce département de gériatrie. Je vous laisse vous faire votre opinion, et voici la notice de rétractation :
We, the Editor and Publisher of Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, have retracted the following article:
Julien Delrieu, Pierre Jean Ousset & Bruno Vellas (2012) Gantenerumab for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12:8, 1077-1086, DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2012.688022
It was brought to our attention that the article contains significant overlap with previously published sources:
Delrieu, J., Ousset, P. J., Caillaud, C., & Vellas, B. (2012). ‘Clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease’: immunotherapy approaches. Journal of Neurochemistry: REVIEW, 120, 186-193.
Schenk, D. (2002). Amyloid-β immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease: the end of the beginning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(10), 824-828.
Following notification, we investigated in accordance with Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines on plagiarism. Overlap includes sections of text being used verbatim or almost verbatim from the above published sources without proper attribution. The authors have been notified and agree with the decision to retract.
We have been informed in our decision-making by our policy on publishing ethics and integrity and the COPE guidelines on retractions.
The retracted article will remain online to maintain the scholarly record, but it will be digitally watermarked on each page as ‘Retracted’.
