Merci à Iain Chalmers pour cette mise au point sur la problématique non résolue d'avoir des accès à des mises à jour actualisées sur les données de la science. Dans cet article de septembre 2010 de PLoS Medicine, les auteurs nous annoncent la constitution d'une nouvelle collaboration KEEP Up. Leur idée : To meet the needs of patients, clinicians, and policymakers, unnecessary trials need to be reduced, and systematic reviews need to be prioritised. Attendons de voir ce que cette collaboration va nous apporter…
"In November 2009, an international meeting in Cologne formed a new collaboration called “KEEP Up,” which will aim to harmonise updating standards and aggregate updating results. This should reduce the workload and enable organisations to be alerted when there are important shifts in evidence. Initiated and coordinated by the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) and involving key systematic reviewing and guidelines organisations such as the Cochrane Collaboration, Duodecim, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), this effort will provide a platform for tackling practical and methodological issues involved in keeping up-to-date."
Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I (2010) Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? PLoS Med 7(9): e1000326. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
